Summary for : (387) Aquitania

DynT.TT.BT T.L B T.DDensity (g/cm^3)Δρ/ρDiameter (km)ΔD/DMass (kg)ΔM/MRefAvg.M
MBASL- | -L4.15 ± 3.31   (D)80 %102.2 ± 3.23.2 %2.32e+18 ± 1.83e+1879 %SEVM
MBASL- | -L3.71 ± 2.55   (D)69 %103.6 ± 3.12.9 %2.16e+18 ± 1.47e+1868 %Sw.avg
MBAL3.27 ± 1.11   (C)34 %103.5 ± 2.22.2 %1.90e+18 ± 6.40e+1734 %C?

Average asteroid densities (g/cm^3):
C = 1.3 ± 0.6, B = 2.4 ± 0.5, S = 2.7 ± 0.5, M = 3.5 ± 1.0, P = 2.8 ± 1.6, X = 1.9 ± 0.8, Xc = 4.9 ± 0.9, Xk = 4.2 ± 0.7 (Ref)

Additional resources:
3D Model | JPL New Horizons | Minor Planet Center | Wikipedia (these auto-generated links might not work)

Note: The density estimates have been ranked from (A) to (E), corresponding to the relative error: (B) less than 20%, (C) between 20 and 50%, (D) between 50 and 100%, and (E) more than 100%. (A) stands for (presumably) reliable estimates (accuracy better than 20%), based on more than 5 mass estimates and 5 diameter estimates, or a spacecraft encounter. Apparently unrealistic densities (ρ > 8) are tagged with (X).

EVM: average by using the Expected Value Method (Ref). w.avg: weighted average (with w = 1/err^2).

T.T: Tholen Tax Class. T.B: Bus & Binzel Tax Class. T T.L: S3OS2 Lazarro (Tholen) Tax Class. T.L B: S3OS2 Lazarro (Bus & Binzel) Tax Class. T.D: DeMeo Tax Class.

Ref: S = SiMDA, C = Carry (2012)


Diameter estimates

DesignationDiameter / Err (km)ΔD/DMethodYearRefNχ2Use
(387) Aquitania100.51 ± 2.902.9 % STM2004D93 0.32 1
(387) Aquitania101.49 ± 5.595.5 % STM2010D64 0.01 2
(387) Aquitania107.62 ± 16.7615.6 % NEATM2010D64 0.11 3
(387) Aquitania105.05 ± 1.341.3 % STM2011D83 4.65 4
(387) Aquitania97.00 ± 4.004.1 % ADAM2017D100 1.66 5

plot, average diameter and derived density

All

Notes (N):
1: This estimate is discarded for the average diameter (and derived density) calculation in Carry (2012).
2: This estimate is discarded for the average diameter (and derived density) calculation in SiMDA (catalog).

ADAM : All-Data Asteroid Modeling. NEATM : Near-Earth Asteroid Thermal Model. STM : Standard Thermal Model.



EVM diam. average D = (102.2 ± 3.24) km   (ΔD/D = 3%, SNR = 31.51) Derived bulk density ρ = (4.15 ± 3.31) g/cm3   (Δρ/ρ = 80%, SNR = 1.3)



References
D64(2010):Ryan, E.L., Woodward, C.E., 2010. Rectified Asteroid Albedos and Diameters from IRAS and MSX Photometry Catalogs. Astronomical Journal 140, 933–943.
D83(2011):Usui, F., Kuroda, D., Müller, T.G., Hasegawa, S., Ishiguro, M., Ootsubo, T., Ishihara, D., Kataza, H., Takita, S., Oyabu, S., Ueno, M., Matsuhara, H., Onaka, T., 2011. Asteroid Catalog Using Akari: AKARI/IRC Mid-Infrared Asteroid Survey. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 63, 1117–1138.
D93(2004):Tedesco, E.F., Noah, P.V., Noah, M.C., Price, S.D., 2004. IRAS Minor Planet Survey. NASA Planetary Data System. IRAS-A-FPA-3-RDR-IMPS-V6.0.
D100(2017):Hanuš, J., Viikinkoski, M., Marchis, F., et al., 2017. Volumes and bulk densities of forty asteroids from ADAM shape modeling. Astronomy and Astrophysics 601, A114 (2017). DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629956


Mass estimates

DesignationMass / Err (kg)ΔM/MMethodYearRefNχ2Use
(387) Aquitania5.32e+18 ± 6.17e+1712 %Ephem 2010M931223.66 1
(387) Aquitania1.90e+18 ± 6.37e+1734 %Ephem 2011M1000.43 2
(387) Aquitania8.88e+17 ± 4.06e+1746 %Ephem 2019M12612.42 3

plot, average mass and derived density

All

Notes (N):
1: This estimate is discarded for the average mass (and derived density) calculation in Carry (2012).
2: This estimate is discarded for the average mass (and derived density) calculation in SiMDA (catalog).
3: This estimate is an average of individual solutions listed before under the same reference (e.g. M125).

Ephem : Planetary ephemeris solution.



EVM mass average M = (2.319 ± 1.832) × 1018 kg   (ΔM/M = 79%, SNR = 1.3) Derived bulk density ρ = (4.15 ± 3.31) g/cm3   (Δρ/ρ = 80%, SNR = 1.3)



References
M93(2010):Fienga, A., Manche, H., Kuchynka, P., Laskar, J., Gastineau, M., 2010. INPOP10a. Scientific Notes.
M100(2011):Fienga, A., Kuchynka, P., Laskar, J., Manche, H., Gastineau, M., 2011. Asteroid mass determinations with INPOP planetary ephemerides. EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011 , 1879.
M126(2019):Fienga, A., et. al, 2019. INPOP19a planetary ephemeris. Notes Scientifiques et Techniques de l'Institut de mécanique céleste,