Summary for : (80) Sappho

DynT.TT.BT T.L B T.DDensity (g/cm^3)Δρ/ρDiameter (km)ΔD/DMass (kg)ΔM/MRefAvg.M
MBASS- | --2.13 ± 1.01   (C)47 %81.5 ± 5.46.7 %6.03e+17 ± 2.58e+1743 %SEVM
MBASS- | --2.04 ± 1.01   (C)50 %82.7 ± 7.08.4 %6.03e+17 ± 2.58e+1743 %Sw.avg

Average asteroid densities (g/cm^3):
C = 1.3 ± 0.6, B = 2.4 ± 0.5, S = 2.7 ± 0.5, M = 3.5 ± 1.0, P = 2.8 ± 1.6, X = 1.9 ± 0.8, Xc = 4.9 ± 0.9, Xk = 4.2 ± 0.7 (Ref)

Additional resources:
3D Model | JPL New Horizons | Minor Planet Center | Wikipedia (these auto-generated links might not work)

Note: The density estimates have been ranked from (A) to (E), corresponding to the relative error: (B) less than 20%, (C) between 20 and 50%, (D) between 50 and 100%, and (E) more than 100%. (A) stands for (presumably) reliable estimates (accuracy better than 20%), based on more than 5 mass estimates and 5 diameter estimates, or a spacecraft encounter. Apparently unrealistic densities (ρ > 8) are tagged with (X).

EVM: average by using the Expected Value Method (Ref). w.avg: weighted average (with w = 1/err^2).

T.T: Tholen Tax Class. T.B: Bus & Binzel Tax Class. T T.L: S3OS2 Lazarro (Tholen) Tax Class. T.L B: S3OS2 Lazarro (Bus & Binzel) Tax Class. T.D: DeMeo Tax Class.

Ref: S = SiMDA, C = Carry (2012)

Diameter estimates

DesignationDiameter / Err (km)ΔD/DMethodYearRefNχ2Use
(80) Sappho84.85 ± 2.112.5 % STM2010D64 2.55 1
(80) Sappho81.15 ± 2.653.3 % NEATM2010D64 0.02 2
(80) Sappho66.00 ± 8.0012.1 % ADAM2017D100 3.75 3

plot, average diameter and derived density

All

Notes (N):
1: This estimate is discarded for the average diameter (and derived density) calculation in Carry (2012).
2: This estimate is discarded for the average diameter (and derived density) calculation in SiMDA (catalog).

ADAM : All-Data Asteroid Modeling. NEATM : Near-Earth Asteroid Thermal Model. STM : Standard Thermal Model.


EVM diam. average D = (81.5 ± 5.45) km   (ΔD/D = 7%, SNR = 14.95) Derived bulk density ρ = (2.13 ± 1.01) g/cm3   (Δρ/ρ = 47%, SNR = 2.1)


References
D64(2010):Ryan, E.L., Woodward, C.E., 2010. Rectified Asteroid Albedos and Diameters from IRAS and MSX Photometry Catalogs. Astronomical Journal 140, 933–943.
D100(2017):Hanuš, J., Viikinkoski, M., Marchis, F., et al., 2017. Volumes and bulk densities of forty asteroids from ADAM shape modeling. Astronomy and Astrophysics 601, A114 (2017). DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629956

Mass estimates

DesignationMass / Err (kg)ΔM/MMethodYearRefNχ2Use
(80) Sappho6.03e+17 ± 2.58e+1743 %Ephem 2019M1260.00 1

Notes (N):
1: This estimate is discarded for the average mass (and derived density) calculation in Carry (2012).
2: This estimate is discarded for the average mass (and derived density) calculation in SiMDA (catalog).
3: This estimate is an average of individual solutions listed before under the same reference (e.g. M125).

Ephem : Planetary ephemeris solution.


EVM mass average M = (6.030 ± 2.580) × 1017 kg   (ΔM/M = 43%, SNR = 2.3) Derived bulk density ρ = (2.13 ± 1.01) g/cm3   (Δρ/ρ = 47%, SNR = 2.1)


References
M126(2019):Fienga, A., et. al, 2019. INPOP19a planetary ephemeris. Notes Scientifiques et Techniques de l'Institut de mécanique céleste,